After Carriers Complete Network Deployment: Who Delivers Visitor Real-Name Authentication & Internet Log Audit Under Order 176?

After telecom carriers finish broadband networking for enterprise parks and office buildings, stable network connectivity does not automatically bring compliant visitor real-name authentication and internet access log auditing. Since MOPS Ministerial Order No.176, Measures for the Supervision and Inspection of Cyberspace Security by Public Security Organs, took effect on October 1, 2026, operators must double-check whether user identity registration, log retention and cybersecurity protection have been fully implemented

Carriers now face a practical challenge: they have finished broadband access and network construction, yet existing hardware often lacks full functions when clients require visitor identity verification, log query and audit management. In many regions, basic broadband services do not cover these compliance modules, making it impossible to meet all client requirements with conventional networking plans.

Who should deliver such projects? Carriers do not need to build systems from scratch or rebuild existing networks entirely. By partnering with AINOPOL, carriers can add authentication and log audit capabilities on top of live networks, linking network deployment with post-launch managed security services.

I. Why Add Visitor Real-Name Authentication & Log Audit After Network Rollout

1. Broadband delivery does not equal ready-made authentication functions
   Carriers deploy fiber links, hardware and network tuning primarily to deliver connectivity. Whether visitor WiFi requires identity verification, how to validate user credentials, and how to bind authentication data with access records all depend on hardware configurations and service designs.

If optical modems or routers only support basic internet forwarding, clients will end up with live networks but no identity management capabilities.

1. A login page does not guarantee complete log management
   Some parks have deployed SMS or QR-code authentication, but compliance still fails if authentication records and online behavior logs are not tightly bound, or logs cannot be filtered, searched and exported on demand. Security incidents cannot be traced without proper log governance.

Rectification must cover not only visitor login workflows, but also log coverage, retention policies, access permissions and standardized management procedures.

1. Carriers own client resources and networks but lack turnkey solutions
   Most carriers have abundant broadband resources, client channels and on-site service teams. However, legacy network devices do not support full visitor authentication and log audit in all regions. Sourcing hardware and designing architectures ad-hoc for every client leads to high communication costs and delayed project delivery.

Partnering with a professional solution vendor lets carriers retain their strengths in network construction while filling technical gaps in authentication and audit.

II. AINOPOL’s Turnkey Deployment Solutions

AINOPOL offers Cloud Portal, Cloud Audit and the M1 Dream Gateway to help carriers build visitor authentication, log management and network security protection on existing infrastructure.

1. Legacy network upgrade: Cloud Portal + Cloud Audit
   For parks and office buildings with finished networking where large-scale hardware replacement is impractical, we first audit existing optical modems, routers and network architecture, then add compliance functions via AINOPOL Cloud Portal and Cloud Audit.

Cloud Portal governs visitor authentication and network access; Cloud Audit centralizes internet logs to support record retrieval, filtering and export. This plug-in integration preserves original equipment and cuts redundant construction costs.

Before deployment, we verify device models, interface availability and network compatibility, and confirm authentication scope, log fields, retention period and export methods to match regulatory requirements.

1. New deployment or full-scale transformation: M1 Dream Gateway
   If legacy hardware is insufficient, or clients want centralized control over authentication, logs and security defense, the AINOPOL M1 Dream Gateway is the optimal choice.

The all-in-one gateway integrates routing, firewall, AC controller and log audit modules. Portal authentication can be enabled on demand, plus IPS, WAF and antivirus tools to reinforce network security.

We can also set strict access boundaries between employee LAN, visitor WiFi and business systems to prevent unauthorized access to internal resources. Note that device activation alone cannot guarantee compliance; full validation based on network topology and regulatory rules is mandatory.

III. Carrier-AINOPOL Cooperation: Turn Compliance Demand into Deliverable Projects

AINOPOL provides hardware, technical designs and end-to-end delivery support to bridge the gap between carriers’ existing services and client rectification needs. Cooperation can start with individual clients and scale up to municipal and provincial carrier branches.

1. Single-project cooperation: Deliver rectification for individual clients
   When carriers receive visitor authentication and log audit requests from broadband clients, AINOPOL jointly evaluates live networks to confirm device compatibility, functional gaps and upgrade scope.

Carriers handle client communication, broadband resource coordination and project progress; AINOPOL delivers tailored solutions, device interconnection and on-site technical implementation.

Carriers no longer need to develop authentication and audit platforms independently. They can upgrade basic broadband into full managed network services and convert unfulfillable compliance requests into profitable projects.

1. Provincial & municipal carrier cooperation: Scale proven solutions
   Project-by-project rollout often leads to repeated product selection and architecture design across regions. By partnering with municipal and provincial carrier headquarters, validated solutions can be standardized and promoted company-wide.

Carriers leverage enterprise client channels and local branch networks to tap compliance demands from industrial parks, office buildings and other venues. AINOPOL supplies standardized packages, technical training, device adaptation and joint delivery support.

We launch pilots first, then replicate mature workflows across the board to improve rollout efficiency. Carriers can launch high-margin value-added services beyond basic broadband access.

Carriers cannot treat network deployment as the end of compliance work. Under Order 176, clients must verify real-name registration and log retention, while carriers need to check whether their service packages cover these mandatory requirements.

AINOPOL delivers Cloud Portal + Cloud Audit for legacy networks and the M1 Dream Gateway for new builds to help carriers fill capability gaps. Whether starting with individual client projects or scaling up to regional carrier-wide promotion, carriers can build a complete enterprise network service portfolio while reusing existing network assets.

FAQ

Q: Does connecting Cloud Portal to carrier optical modems require hardware replacement or rewiring?
A: No. Cloud Portal connects to existing optical modems via plug-in integration without changing original broadband forwarding functions. Carrier teams only manage plug-in status and export compliance reports on the cloud platform, with no need to deploy or maintain local log servers.

Q: What causes the common failure: unable to pull a full activity list by mobile phone number during inspections?
A: The top root cause is that authentication records and behavior logs run on two separate systems without session-level binding. Cloud Audit generates a unique session ID upon successful login, and all online activities are tagged with this ID to link behavior directly to verified identities. Binding must be built at the data collection stage, instead of matching IP and timestamps manually during audits.

Q: Have carriers been held accountable for incomplete log records?
A: Yes. An enterprise in Changle was fined for failing to register network tenants under real-name rules and missing log retention. Public security authorities launched a dual-accountability investigation and ordered its broadband access carrier to rectify the failure to collect real user identity information. Under Order 176, accountability boundaries between network builders and venue operators must be clarified early in project delivery.